<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Query logs and information retrieval research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probablyirrelevant.org/2010/06/query-logs-and-information-retrieval-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probablyirrelevant.org/2010/06/query-logs-and-information-retrieval-research/</link>
	<description>Information Retrieval Research and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:19:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee S Jensen</title>
		<link>http://probablyirrelevant.org/2010/06/query-logs-and-information-retrieval-research/comment-page-1/#comment-9424</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee S Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probablyirrelevant.org/?p=76#comment-9424</guid>
		<description>AOL got in big trouble when it released its search log. This was because it violated privacy issues. However, with a vertical search system the logs don&#039;t generally have that concern. Being able to track the search path of person when they are only looking at genealogy (www.ancestry.com) or cameras (www.dpreview.com) doesn&#039;t really tell you anything valuable about a particular person. Focusing on getting search logs from these types of companies should be our focus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL got in big trouble when it released its search log. This was because it violated privacy issues. However, with a vertical search system the logs don&#8217;t generally have that concern. Being able to track the search path of person when they are only looking at genealogy (www.ancestry.com) or cameras (www.dpreview.com) doesn&#8217;t really tell you anything valuable about a particular person. Focusing on getting search logs from these types of companies should be our focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neelannair</title>
		<link>http://probablyirrelevant.org/2010/06/query-logs-and-information-retrieval-research/comment-page-1/#comment-9217</link>
		<dc:creator>neelannair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probablyirrelevant.org/?p=76#comment-9217</guid>
		<description>Valid points.

But I guess query logs are a huge investment for most search engines. It forms part of their competitive advantage over other search engines.

I&#039;d like to propose a time-out clause for search engine query logs. They could release query logs more than &#039;n&#039; years old for a license and fee. So Universities can give open access to researchers to work with them.

As far as the Lemur Project was concerned, I came to know about it in the news that it had been discontinued. There is such a thing as publicity, I guess. Wonder if they tied up with existing search engines or something to promote the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valid points.</p>
<p>But I guess query logs are a huge investment for most search engines. It forms part of their competitive advantage over other search engines.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to propose a time-out clause for search engine query logs. They could release query logs more than &#8216;n&#8217; years old for a license and fee. So Universities can give open access to researchers to work with them.</p>
<p>As far as the Lemur Project was concerned, I came to know about it in the news that it had been discontinued. There is such a thing as publicity, I guess. Wonder if they tied up with existing search engines or something to promote the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

